Comparisons 24-08-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 888 Plus or Snapdragon 775G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 99% |
Snapdragon 775G | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 87% |
Snapdragon 775G | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Plus | 98% |
Snapdragon 775G | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Snapdragon 775G | | Total score | 897046 | 542926 | | CPU | 268491 | 91177 | | GPU | 334895 | 113501 | | MEM | 153388 | 52158 | | UX | 139755 | 47521 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Snapdragon 775G | | Single-Core | 1250 | 1216 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 4134 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Plus |
Snapdragon 775G | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 680 Prime
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 680 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 680 Silver | 1x3.0 GHz Kryo 575 Prime
1x2.4 GHz Kryo 575 Gold
6x2.0 GHz Kryo 575 Silver | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4666 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 17 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 640 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 750 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 986 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 512 | 384 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 56.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 53.2 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 54.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 44.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 70.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 106.4 | | Sniper 3D | | 117 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 85.1 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 61.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 63.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 192 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 22 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Qualcomm Spectra 355 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, Galileo, NavIC, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
