|
MediaTek MT8167D vs Intel Atom Z3735F |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT8167D vs Intel Atom Z3735F, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8300 and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail). This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35) and Atom Z3735F is quad-core (Bay Trail). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, Octane V2, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MT8167D or Atom Z3735F and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT8167D | 28% |
Atom Z3735F | 36% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8167D |
Atom Z3735F | Total score | 24936 | 21810 | CPU | 6992 | 6097 | GPU | 9483 | 8285 | MEM | 3995 | 3484 | UX | 4495 | 3930 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8167D |
Atom Z3735F | Single-Core | 66 | 57 | Multi-Core | 304 | 266 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8167D |
Atom Z3735F | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1330 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35 | 4x1.33-1.83 GHz Bay Trail | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1333 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3735F is 2% better than MT8167D in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 128.75 | 42.8 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 5.7 | 7.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.5 | 18.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 10.9 | 12.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 10.1 | 10.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 14.6 | 14.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.6 | 22.2 | Real Racing 3 | 13.6 | 15.9 | Sniper 3D | 14.2 | 16.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 13.1 | 17.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 15.8 | 14.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 14.2 | 14 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Intel XMM 7160 | Upload speed | | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3735F is better: 17 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8167D SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
Atom Z3735F SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
| |
|