MediaTek MT8167D vs MediaTek MT8127

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8167D vs MediaTek MT8127, speed testing of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and PowerVR GE8300.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35) and MT8127 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Geekbench, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, 3DMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MT8167D or MT8127 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8167D

MT8127

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8167D

28%

MT8127

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8167D

MT8127

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8167D	MT8127
Total score	24936	26416
CPU	6992	7397
GPU	9483	10031
MEM	3995	4217
UX	4495	4748

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8167D	MT8127
Single-Core	66	70
Multi-Core	304	322

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8167D	MT8127
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	35.77
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.7	4.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.5	18.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.9	10.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	10.1	10.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	14.6	14.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.6	24.3
Real Racing 3	13.6	21.2
Sniper 3D	14.2	20.1
Need for Speed No Limits	13.1	17
Mortal Kombat X	15.8	13.8
CSR Racing 2	14.2	13.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8127 is better: 20
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT8167D and MT8127, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8167D SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8167D specs and review.

MT8127 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8127 specs and review.