MediaTek MT8167D vs MediaTek MT6737H

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8167D vs MediaTek MT6737H, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR GE8300 and Mali-T720.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35) and MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of chips in Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT8167D or MT6737H and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8167D

MT6737H

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8167D

28%

MT6737H

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8167D

MT6737H

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8167D	MT6737H
Total score	24936	23870
CPU	6992	6687
GPU	9483	9070
MEM	3995	3827
UX	4495	4301

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8167D	MT6737H
Single-Core	66	63
Multi-Core	304	291

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8167D	MT6737H
Frequency	1300 MHz	1250 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	640
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8167D is 3% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	Mali-T720
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	7.65
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.7	6.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.5	18.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.9	12.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	10.1	11.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	14.6	15.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.6	23.1
Real Racing 3	13.6	16.1
Sniper 3D	14.2	20.6
Need for Speed No Limits	13.1	23.2
Mortal Kombat X	15.8	14.8
CSR Racing 2	14.2	18.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 17
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 13
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT8167D and MT6737H, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8167D SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8167D specs and review.

MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6737H specs and review.