MediaTek MT8167D vs MediaTek MT6735

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8167D vs MediaTek MT6735, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR GE8300 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35) and MT6735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT8167D or MT6735 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8167D

MT6735

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8167D

28%

MT6735

23%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8167D

MT6735

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8167D	MT6735
Total score	24936	27900
CPU	6992	7813
GPU	9483	10597
MEM	3995	4470
UX	4495	5027

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8167D	MT6735
Single-Core	66	74
Multi-Core	304	341

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8167D	MT6735
Frequency	1300 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6735 is 13% better than MT8167D in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8300	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	660 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	128.75	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.7	7.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.5	21.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.9	13.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	10.1	13.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	14.6	17.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.6	27.4
Real Racing 3	13.6	20.9
Sniper 3D	14.2	26.4
Need for Speed No Limits	13.1	25
Mortal Kombat X	15.8	22.2
CSR Racing 2	14.2	16.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735 is better: 24
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8167D SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8167D specs and review.

MT6735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735 specs and review.