MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT8167D

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT8167D, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and PowerVR GE8300.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6735T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT6735T or MT8167D and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6735T

MT8167D

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6735T

26%

MT8167D

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6735T

MT8167D

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6735T	MT8167D
Total score	23688	24936
CPU	6630	6992
GPU	8997	9483
MEM	3787	3995
UX	4266	4495

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6735T	MT8167D
Single-Core	62	66
Multi-Core	289	304

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6735T	MT8167D
Frequency	1000 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8167D is 23% better than MT6735T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	PowerVR GE8300
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	660 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	128.75
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	5.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.2	18.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	12.7	10.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.9	10.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.3	14.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.3	23.6
Real Racing 3	22.2	13.6
Sniper 3D	20.3	14.2
Need for Speed No Limits	17.8	13.1
Mortal Kombat X	18.4	15.8
CSR Racing 2	15.2	14.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735T is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 13
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT6735T and MT8167D, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6735T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735T specs and review.

MT8167D SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8167D specs and review.