MediaTek MT6753T vs MediaTek MT8167D

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6753T vs MediaTek MT8167D, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP3 and PowerVR GE8300.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6753T is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8167D is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A35). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MT6753T or MT8167D and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6753T

MT8167D

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6753T

25%

MT8167D

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6753T

MT8167D

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6753T	MT8167D
Total score	30181	24936
CPU	8448	6992
GPU	11469	9483
MEM	4818	3995
UX	5436	4495

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6753T	MT8167D
Single-Core	80	66
Multi-Core	368	304

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6753T	MT8167D
Frequency	1500 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	8	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A35
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6753T is 13% better than MT8167D in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6753T has -4 more core than MT8167D. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP3	PowerVR GE8300
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	660 MHz
GFloPS	35.7	128.75
# of Cores	3	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	9.6	5.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	24.1	18.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	16.8	10.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.7	10.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	19.9	14.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	31.6	23.6
Real Racing 3	33.6	13.6
Sniper 3D	26.9	14.2
Need for Speed No Limits	30.2	13.1
Mortal Kombat X	24.4	15.8
CSR Racing 2	23.5	14.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6753T is better: 31
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167D is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6753T and MT8167D, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6753T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6753T specs and review.

MT8167D SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT8167D specs and review.