Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs MediaTek MT6737

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs MediaTek MT6737, compare of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57) and MT6737 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GFXBench, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 5433 or MT6737 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

MT6737

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

41%

MT6737

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

MT6737

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	MT6737
Total score	50387	29344
CPU	14101	8218
GPU	19141	11149
MEM	8051	4686
UX	9064	5285

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	MT6737
Single-Core	130	77
Multi-Core	586	358

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	MT6737
Frequency	1900 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	8	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	3 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	1650	640
Memory bandwidth	14	4.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 31% better than MT6737 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 7 Octa 5433 has -4 more core than MT6737. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP6	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	550 MHz
GFloPS	142	18.7
# of Cores	6	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	15.8	9.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	41.6	23.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	27.2	15.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	24.6	14.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	34.7	19.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	52.8	30.7
Real Racing 3	47.6	19.9
Sniper 3D	51.7	30.2
Need for Speed No Limits	43.5	19.1
Mortal Kombat X	35.4	25.4
CSR Racing 2	32.6	19.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	42 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	11 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 37
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737 is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and MT6737, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 5433 specs and review.

MT6737 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6737 specs and review.