|
MediaTek MT6739WM vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6739WM vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8100 and Mali-T760 MP6. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6739WM is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Octane V2, Quadrant, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MT6739WM or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6739WM | 2% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6739WM | 30% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 41% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6739WM | 1% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6739WM |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Total score | 34420 | 50387 | CPU | 9642 | 14101 | GPU | 13080 | 19141 | MEM | 5508 | 8051 | UX | 6201 | 9064 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6739WM |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Single-Core | 91 | 130 | Multi-Core | 420 | 586 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6739WM |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1900 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 42% better than MT6739WM in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6739WM has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 5433. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-T760 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 570 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 11.2 | 142 | # of Cores | 1 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 10.1 | 15.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 27.1 | 41.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 18.4 | 27.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 15.5 | 24.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.4 | 34.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 35.1 | 52.8 | Real Racing 3 | 27.6 | 47.6 | Sniper 3D | 23.9 | 51.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 29.4 | 43.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 21.2 | 35.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 23.9 | 32.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 42 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WM is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 35 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6739WM and Exynos 7 Octa 5433, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6739WM SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|