Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs MediaTek MT6595M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs MediaTek MT6595M, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-T760 MP6.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57) and MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Octane V2, and how good the SoCs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 5433 or MT6595M and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

MT6595M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

41%

MT6595M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

MT6595M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	MT6595M
Total score	50387	60152
CPU	14101	16841
GPU	19141	22865
MEM	8051	9626
UX	9064	10822

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	MT6595M
Single-Core	130	155
Multi-Core	586	700

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	MT6595M
Frequency	1900 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	32
Lithography	20 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	3 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	1650	667
Memory bandwidth	14	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595M is 5% better than Exynos 7 Octa 5433 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP6	PowerVR SGX544
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	357 MHz
GFloPS	142	11.48
# of Cores	6	1
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	15.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	41.6	10.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	27.2	19.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	24.6	11.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	34.7	7.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	52.8	11.5
Real Racing 3	47.6	39.4
Sniper 3D	51.7	25.6
Need for Speed No Limits	43.5	23.6
Mortal Kombat X	35.4	22.7
CSR Racing 2	32.6	25.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	42 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	11 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 10
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and MT6595M, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 5433 specs and review.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.