HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, speed examination of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-T760 MP6.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Geekbench, PCMark, Octane V2, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 620 or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 620

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 620

24%

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

41%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 620

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 620	Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Total score	33885	50387
CPU	9480	14101
GPU	12867	19141
MEM	5430	8051
UX	6089	9064

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 620	Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Single-Core	90	130
Multi-Core	414	586

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 620	Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Frequency	1200 MHz	1900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	20 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	3 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1650
Memory bandwidth	28	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	64 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	4 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 36% better than Kirin 620 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-450 MP4	Mali-T760 MP6
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	29.81	142
# of Cores	4	6
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.9	15.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	28.4	41.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.1	27.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	17.4	24.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.5	34.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	35.4	52.8
Real Racing 3	38.2	47.6
Sniper 3D	24.8	51.7
Need for Speed No Limits	22.9	43.5
Mortal Kombat X	24.8	35.4
CSR Racing 2	24.8	32.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	42 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	11 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 30
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Kirin 620 and Exynos 7 Octa 5433, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 620 specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 5433 specs and review.