Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and Mali-T830 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57) and Kirin 650 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 5433 or Kirin 650 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Kirin 650

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

41%

Kirin 650

50%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Kirin 650

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	Kirin 650
Total score	50387	51180
CPU	14101	14339
GPU	19141	19441
MEM	8051	8184
UX	9064	9208

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	Kirin 650
Single-Core	130	132
Multi-Core	586	596

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 7 Octa 5433	Kirin 650
Frequency	1900 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	3 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1650	933
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 650 is 5% better than Exynos 7 Octa 5433 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP6	Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	142	61.2
# of Cores	6	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	15.8	17.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	41.6	43.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	27.2	29.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	24.6	26.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	34.7	36.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	52.8	54.9
Real Racing 3	47.6	59.8
Sniper 3D	51.7	47.8
Need for Speed No Limits	43.5	41.9
Mortal Kombat X	35.4	43.4
CSR Racing 2	32.6	38.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	42 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	11 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 650 is better: 23
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and Kirin 650, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 5433 specs and review.

Kirin 650 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Kirin 650 specs and review.