Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and Mali-T830 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57) and Kirin 650 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 5433 or Kirin 650 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

 
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
HiSilicon Kirin 650

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 7 Octa 54333% Kirin 6503%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 7 Octa 543341% Kirin 65050%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 7 Octa 54331% Kirin 6501%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 Kirin 650
Total score5038751180
CPU1410114339
GPU1914119441
MEM80518184
UX90649208

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 Kirin 650
Single-Core130132
Multi-Core586596

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 Kirin 650
Frequency1900 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography20 nm16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57
4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)3 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR3x
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency1650933
Memory bandwidth14
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache384 KB
L2 cache512 KB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 650 is 5% better than Exynos 7 Octa 5433 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T760 MP6Mali-T830 MP2
GPU Frequency700 MHz900 MHz
GFloPS14261.2
# of Cores62
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1600 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile15.817.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)41.643.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra27.229.9
Call of Duty: Mobile24.626.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)34.736.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition52.854.9
Real Racing 347.659.8
Sniper 3D51.747.8
Need for Speed No Limits43.541.9
Mortal Kombat X35.443.4
CSR Racing 232.638.9
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS12030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed42 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed11 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 650 is better: 23
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and Kirin 650, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Kirin 650 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E


Kirin 650 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands