|
MediaTek MT6752 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6752 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and Mali-T760 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6752 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, GFXBench, Octane V2, PCMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, 3DMark, and how good the chips are in games Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MT6752 or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6752 | 3% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6752 | 23% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 41% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6752 | 1% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6752 |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Total score | 43446 | 50387 | CPU | 12157 | 14101 | GPU | 16512 | 19141 | MEM | 6954 | 8051 | UX | 7821 | 9064 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6752 |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Single-Core | 115 | 130 | Multi-Core | 531 | 586 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6752 |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Frequency | 1700 MHz | 1900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 10% better than MT6752 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T760 MP2 | Mali-T760 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 47.6 | 142 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 13.5 | 15.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 35.4 | 41.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 23.8 | 27.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.6 | 24.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 29.1 | 34.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 44.5 | 52.8 | Real Racing 3 | 47.6 | 47.6 | Sniper 3D | 45.2 | 51.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 38.1 | 43.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 34.5 | 35.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 28.6 | 32.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 42 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6752 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 30 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6752 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|