|
MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and PowerVR G6200. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio X10 (MT6795) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Helio X10 (MT6795) or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio X10 (MT6795) | 3% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio X10 (MT6795) | 20% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 41% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio X10 (MT6795) | 1% |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio X10 (MT6795) |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Total score | 50430 | 50387 | CPU | 14114 | 14101 | GPU | 19163 | 19141 | MEM | 8066 | 8051 | UX | 9083 | 9064 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio X10 (MT6795) |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Single-Core | 130 | 130 | Multi-Core | 587 | 586 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio X10 (MT6795) |
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X10 (MT6795) is 5% better than Exynos 7 Octa 5433 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR G6200 | Mali-T760 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 89.6 | 142 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 16.5 | 15.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 42.5 | 41.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 28.1 | 27.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.4 | 24.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.5 | 34.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 53.9 | 52.8 | Real Racing 3 | 35.1 | 47.6 | Sniper 3D | 61.8 | 51.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 39.3 | 43.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 32.3 | 35.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 39.3 | 32.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 42 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 13 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio X10 (MT6795) SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|