MediaTek MT6737T vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6737T vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP6 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6737T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MT6737T or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6737T

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6737T

27%

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

41%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6737T

Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6737T	Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Total score	38244	50387
CPU	10710	14101
GPU	14523	19141
MEM	6121	8051
UX	6884	9064

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6737T	Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Single-Core	101	130
Multi-Core	467	586

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6737T	Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Frequency	1500 MHz	1900 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	20 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	3 W
Memory type	LPDDR2, LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	733	1650
Memory bandwidth	4	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 21% better than MT6737T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6737T has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 5433. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T760 MP6
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	142
# of Cores	2	6
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	12.4	15.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	31.9	41.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	20.7	27.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	17.9	24.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	26.7	34.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	39.2	52.8
Real Racing 3	31.1	47.6
Sniper 3D	39.3	51.7
Need for Speed No Limits	24.8	43.5
Mortal Kombat X	23.8	35.4
CSR Racing 2	24.8	32.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	42 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	11 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737T is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 36
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6737T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6737T specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 5433 specs and review.