Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc SC9832E vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433, compare of GPUs Mali-T820 and Mali-T760 MP6.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: SC9832E is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy SC9832E or Exynos 7 Octa 5433 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

 
Unisoc SC9832E
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
SC9832E2% Exynos 7 Octa 54333%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
SC9832E32% Exynos 7 Octa 543341%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
SC9832E1% Exynos 7 Octa 54331%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
SC9832E Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Total score3806750387
CPU1066414101
GPU1446419141
MEM60888051
UX68559064

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
SC9832E Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Single-Core101130
Multi-Core465586

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
SC9832E Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Frequency1400 MHz1900 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm20 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A57
4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)3 W3 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR3
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency9331650
Memory bandwidth614
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is 26% better than SC9832E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that SC9832E has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 5433. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T820Mali-T760 MP6
GPU Frequency600 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS10.2142
# of Cores16
# of Shader Units
Display1440 x 720 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile11.915.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)30.941.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra19.827.2
Call of Duty: Mobile16.724.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)25.534.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition38.452.8
Real Racing 329.747.6
Sniper 3D37.651.7
Need for Speed No Limits23.843.5
Mortal Kombat X31.735.4
CSR Racing 221.832.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS30120
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-4
Download speed150 MBit/s.42 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.11 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9832E is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 is better: 32
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips SC9832E and Exynos 7 Octa 5433, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
SC9832E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


SC9832E SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490


Exynos 7 Octa 5433 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands