Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T

Comparisons   16-07-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Tiger T760 or MediaTek Kompanio 900T.


 
Unisoc Tiger T760
MediaTek Kompanio 900T

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T76032% MediaTek Kompanio 900T35%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T76083% MediaTek Kompanio 900T77%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T76031% MediaTek Kompanio 900T33%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T760 MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Total score446896494245
CPU125130138383
GPU169811187804
MEM7150379088
UX8043788972

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T760 MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Single-Core6531058
Multi-Core26933495

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T760 MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Frequency2500 MHz2600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR4/4x/4yLPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency21332133
Memory bandwidth4824
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 900T is 3% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP5Mali-G68 MC4
GPU Frequency850 MHz800 MHz
GFloPS705.5686
# of Cores54
# of Shader Units128
Display2160 x 1080 pixels2000 x 1000 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.929.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)56.344.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra58.857.6
Call of Duty: Mobile42.854.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)49.835.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition75.656.9
Real Racing 372.3113.9
Sniper 3D128.4107.4
Need for Speed No Limits81.279.1
Mortal Kombat X84.191.9
CSR Racing 264.767.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP108 MP
Dual Camera resolution20 MP20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemIvy V510 5G5G Multi-Mode
Download speed3500 MBit/s.2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.1800 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGlonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 17
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Tiger T760 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands