MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T

Comparisons 20-05-2022

Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 1300T or MediaTek Kompanio 900T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

50%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

35%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

79%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

77%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

48%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

33%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Total score	694535	494245
CPU	194474	138383
GPU	263927	187804
MEM	111132	79088
UX	125023	88972

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Single-Core	1477	1058
Multi-Core	4585	3495

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Frequency	2600 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	5800 millions
Core configuration	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	29	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	320 KB
L3 cache	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G68 MC4
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	504	686
# of Cores	9	4
# of Shader Units		128
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2000 x 1000 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.5	29.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	83.1	44.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	50.9	57.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	46.5	54.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	70.9	35.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	102.5	56.9
Real Racing 3	88.9	113.9
Sniper 3D	65.1	107.4
Need for Speed No Limits	60.5	79.1
Mortal Kombat X	65.9	91.9
CSR Racing 2	60.9	67.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	1800 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF	Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 13
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 900T specs and review.