HiSilicon Kirin 9000L vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T

Comparisons   21-05-2022
   Comprehensive compare data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000L vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 9000L or MediaTek Kompanio 900T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 9000L

46%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

35%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 9000L

81%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

77%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 9000L

45%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

33%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 9000L	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Total score	644858	494245
CPU	180568	138383
GPU	245056	187804
MEM	103175	79088
UX	116065	88972

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 9000L	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Single-Core	1018	1058
Multi-Core	3529	3495

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 9000L	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Frequency	2860 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000L is 9% better than MediaTek Kompanio 900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP14	Mali-G68 MC4
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	976	686
# of Cores	24	4
# of Shader Units		128
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2000 x 1000 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.5	29.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	72.9	44.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	100.9	57.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	56.7	54.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	62.1	35.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	91.1	56.9
Real Racing 3	175.2	113.9
Sniper 3D	160.4	107.4
Need for Speed No Limits	140.7	79.1
Mortal Kombat X	130.1	91.9
CSR Racing 2	140.4	67.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	128 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Balong 5G	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	14000 MBit/s.	1800 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000L is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 9000L SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000L specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 900T specs and review.