Comparisons 03-12-2021 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or Dimensity 1200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Kompanio 900T | 81% |
Dimensity 1200 | 95% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 73% |
Dimensity 1200 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Kompanio 900T | 74% |
Dimensity 1200 | 89% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Dimensity 1200 | Total score | 494245 | 634362 | CPU | 135989 | 163368 | GPU | 116434 | 139627 | MEM | 88895 | 106600 | UX | 77760 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Dimensity 1200 | Single-Core | 1058 | 1349 | Multi-Core | 3495 | 4187 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Dimensity 1200 | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | 5800 millions | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 32 KB | L2 cache | | 320 KB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 is 13% better than MediaTek Kompanio 900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 686 | 504 | # of Cores | 4 | 9 | # of Shader Units | 128 | | Display | 2000 x 1000 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 71.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 98.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 55.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 61.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 89.5 | Real Racing 3 | | 197 | Sniper 3D | | 216.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 157.6 | Mortal Kombat X | | 157.6 | CSR Racing 2 | | 137.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better: 34 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Google Tensor • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • GeekBench 5 mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
|