|
Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Geekbench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Tiger T760 or Snapdragon 855 Plus.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T760 | 32% |
Snapdragon 855 Plus | 24% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T760 | 83% |
Snapdragon 855 Plus | 71% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T760 | 31% |
Snapdragon 855 Plus | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T760 |
Snapdragon 855 Plus | Total score | 446896 | 336359 | CPU | 125130 | 94181 | GPU | 169811 | 127823 | MEM | 71503 | 53817 | UX | 80437 | 60543 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T760 |
Snapdragon 855 Plus | Single-Core | 653 | 753 | Multi-Core | 2693 | 2561 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T760 |
Snapdragon 855 Plus | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2960 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 34.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.1-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 855 Plus is 15% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Adreno 640 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 705.5 | 986 | # of Cores | 5 | | # of Shader Units | | 384 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.9 | 30.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 56.3 | 41.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.8 | 61.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 42.8 | 60.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 49.8 | 32.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 75.6 | 51.7 | Real Racing 3 | 72.3 | 77.1 | Sniper 3D | 128.4 | 135.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.2 | 111.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 84.1 | 80.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.7 | 80.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 22 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Qualcomm Spectra 380 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 LTE modem | Download speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 2048 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 316 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo, GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus is better: 17 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T760 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Snapdragon 855 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
| |
|