Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Comparisons   16-07-2023
   Detailed comparison data of Unisoc Tiger T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
   After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Tiger T760 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.

 
Unisoc Tiger T760
MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T76032% MediaTek Dimensity 900073%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T76083% MediaTek Dimensity 900082%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T76031% MediaTek Dimensity 900072%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T760 MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Total score4468961021474
CPU125130286017
GPU169811388151
MEM71503163439
UX80437183864

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T760 MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Single-Core6531168
Multi-Core26934246

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T760 MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Frequency2500 MHz3050 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm5 nm
Transistors count8400 millions
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)5 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR4/4x/4yLPDDR5x
Max. Memory16 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency21337500
Memory bandwidth4852
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache4 MB32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 18% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP5Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency850 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS705.51648
# of Cores510
# of Shader Units
Display2160 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.939.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)56.3121.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra58.872.1
Call of Duty: Mobile42.866.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)49.8103.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition75.6149.2
Real Racing 372.3145.8
Sniper 3D128.4159.2
Need for Speed No Limits81.2101.4
Mortal Kombat X84.1104.2
CSR Racing 264.787.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP320 MP
Dual Camera resolution20 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemIvy V510 5GSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed3500 MBit/s.7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouBeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 34
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Tiger T760 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands