|
Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Google Tensor |
|
Comparisons 16-07-2023 Full testing data of Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Google Tensor, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Tiger T760 or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T760 |
Tensor | Total score | 446896 | 798643 | CPU | 125130 | 223623 | GPU | 169811 | 303478 | MEM | 71503 | 127772 | UX | 80437 | 143757 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T760 |
Tensor | Single-Core | 653 | 1045 | Multi-Core | 2693 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T760 |
Tensor | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor is 10% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 705.5 | 986 | # of Cores | 5 | 22 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.9 | 31.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 56.3 | 94.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.8 | 56.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 42.8 | 52.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 49.8 | 80.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 75.6 | 116.7 | Real Racing 3 | 72.3 | 113.9 | Sniper 3D | 128.4 | 124.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.2 | 79.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 84.1 | 82.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.7 | 68.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 240 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Exynos Modem 5123 | Download speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T760 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Tensor SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Google Tensor Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|