MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T760

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T760, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra or Tiger T760.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

34%

Tiger T760

32%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

89%

Tiger T760

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

33%

Tiger T760

31%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Tiger T760
Total score	755955	446896
CPU	211667	125130
GPU	287263	169811
MEM	120958	71503
UX	136072	80437

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Tiger T760
Single-Core	1112	653
Multi-Core	3904	2693

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Tiger T760
Frequency	2500 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G57 MP5
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	1856	705.5
# of Cores	6	5
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.1	27.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	89.7	56.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.8	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.1	42.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	77.7	49.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	111.6	75.6
Real Racing 3	108.1	72.3
Sniper 3D	118.2	128.4
Need for Speed No Limits	75.1	81.2
Mortal Kombat X	79.3	84.1
CSR Racing 2	65.9	64.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 10
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra specs and review.

Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T760 specs and review.