MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Unisoc Tiger T760

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Unisoc Tiger T760, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or Tiger T760.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

Tiger T760

32%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

Tiger T760

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

Tiger T760

31%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Tiger T760
Total score	530286	446896
CPU	148477	125130
GPU	201504	169811
MEM	84843	71503
UX	95447	80437

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Tiger T760
Single-Core	850	653
Multi-Core	2957	2693

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7025	Tiger T760
Frequency	2500 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		256 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G57 MP5
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	256	705.5
# of Cores	8	5
# of Shader Units	256
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.4	27.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.4	56.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.3	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.4	42.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	43.6	49.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	68.5	75.6
Real Racing 3	103.8	72.3
Sniper 3D	114.5	128.4
Need for Speed No Limits	83.7	81.2
Mortal Kombat X	59.7	84.1
CSR Racing 2	62.6	64.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 19
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.

Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T760 specs and review.