|
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
|
Comparisons 16-01-2024 Detailed testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 8000 or MediaTek Kompanio 900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 8000 | 30% |
MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 35% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 8000 | 86% |
MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 77% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 8000 | 27% |
MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 33% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 8000 |
MediaTek Kompanio 900T | Total score | 659883 | 494245 | CPU | 184769 | 138383 | GPU | 250747 | 187804 | MEM | 105574 | 79088 | UX | 118769 | 88972 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 8000 |
MediaTek Kompanio 900T | Single-Core | 945 | 1058 | Multi-Core | 3611 | 3495 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 8000 |
MediaTek Kompanio 900T | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 900T is 15% better than Kirin 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Mali-G68 MC4 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 686 | # of Cores | 4 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2000 x 1000 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 30.6 | 29.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 74.9 | 44.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 103.6 | 57.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 57.7 | 54.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 64.6 | 35.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 94.6 | 56.9 | Real Racing 3 | 128.5 | 113.9 | Sniper 3D | 165.8 | 107.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 144.2 | 79.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 118.7 | 91.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 144.5 | 67.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 2770 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 1800 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 8000 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 8 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 8000 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|