MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T

Comparisons   31-08-2022
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PassMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 820 or MediaTek Kompanio 900T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 820

31%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

35%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 820

78%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

77%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 820

29%

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

33%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 820	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Total score	434348	494245
CPU	121620	138383
GPU	165046	187804
MEM	69495	79088
UX	78182	88972

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 820	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Single-Core	662	1058
Multi-Core	2622	3495

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 820	MediaTek Kompanio 900T
Frequency	2200 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 900T is 15% better than MediaTek Kompanio 820 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Mali-G68 MC4
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	705.5	686
# of Cores	5	4
# of Shader Units		128
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2000 x 1000 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.6	29.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.7	44.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.9	57.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	41.4	54.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	48.3	35.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	73.9	56.9
Real Racing 3	71.5	113.9
Sniper 3D	124.7	107.4
Need for Speed No Limits	79.4	79.1
Mortal Kombat X	81.6	91.9
CSR Racing 2	62.7	67.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	1800 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5	Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 820 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 18
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Kompanio 820 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 820 specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 900T specs and review.