Comparisons 03-12-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or Kirin 9000E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 81% |
Kirin 9000E | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 73% |
Kirin 9000E | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 74% |
Kirin 9000E | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Kirin 9000E | | Total score | 494245 | 678577 | | CPU | 135989 | 216046 | | GPU | 116434 | 227655 | | MEM | 88895 | 126580 | | UX | 77760 | 107532 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Kirin 9000E | | Single-Core | 1058 | 992 | | Multi-Core | 3495 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Kirin 9000E | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 313 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 900T is 87% better than Kirin 9000E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 686 | 986 | | # of Cores | 4 | 22 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2000 x 1000 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 80.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 100.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 60.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 107.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 87.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 70.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 58.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000E
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
