MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Comparisons   03-12-2021
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or Kirin 9000E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

35%

Kirin 9000E

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

77%

Kirin 9000E

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

33%

Kirin 9000E

45%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 900T	Kirin 9000E
Total score	494245	678577
CPU	138383	189996
GPU	187804	257866
MEM	79088	108569
UX	88972	122143

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 900T	Kirin 9000E
Single-Core	1058	992
Multi-Core	3495	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 900T	Kirin 9000E
Frequency	2600 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1600
Memory bandwidth	24	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 16% better than MediaTek Kompanio 900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	686	986
# of Cores	4	22
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2000 x 1000 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.9	26.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	44.5	80.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	57.6	48.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	54.3	44.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.6	68.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	56.9	100.7
Real Racing 3	113.9	60.9
Sniper 3D	107.4	107.1
Need for Speed No Limits	79.1	87.7
Mortal Kombat X	91.9	70.6
CSR Racing 2	67.6	58.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	20 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 14
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 24
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 900T specs and review.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.