Comparisons 03-12-2021
Detailed testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs Apple A12X Bionic, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like 3DMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or A12X Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 81% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 73% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 74% |
A12X Bionic | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
A12X Bionic | | Total score | 494245 | 673441 | | CPU | 135989 | 188899 | | GPU | 116434 | 344837 | | MEM | 88895 | 65022 | | UX | 77760 | 77176 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
A12X Bionic | | Single-Core | 1058 | 1152 | | Multi-Core | 3495 | 4435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
A12X Bionic | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2490 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex
4x1.6 GHz Tempest | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 42 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 48 KB | | L2 cache | | 4 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 900T is 4% better than A12X Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Apple A12X Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | GFloPS | 686 | 1360 | | # of Cores | 4 | 7 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2000 x 1000 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.9 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.1 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 85.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 63.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 78.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 56.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 63.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic is better: 29
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A12X Bionic
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
