Comparisons 03-12-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs Samsung Exynos 2100, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the processors are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or Exynos 2100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 81% |
Exynos 2100 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 73% |
Exynos 2100 | 95% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Kompanio 900T | 74% |
Exynos 2100 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Exynos 2100 | | Total score | 494245 | 672647 | | CPU | 135989 | 194890 | | GPU | 116434 | 273522 | | MEM | 88895 | 105982 | | UX | 77760 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Exynos 2100 | | Single-Core | 1058 | 1321 | | Multi-Core | 3495 | 4216 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 900T |
Exynos 2100 | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2910 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 10% better than MediaTek Kompanio 900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G78 MP14 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 686 | 976 | | # of Cores | 4 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2000 x 1000 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 78.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 98.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 83 | | Sniper 3D | | 90.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 75.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 54.5 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
|
