|
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|
Comparisons 14-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Unisoc Tiger T760, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 3DMark, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S or Tiger T760.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 53% |
Tiger T760 | 32% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 85% |
Tiger T760 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 52% |
Tiger T760 | 31% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
Tiger T760 | Total score | 738244 | 446896 | CPU | 206711 | 125130 | GPU | 280524 | 169811 | MEM | 118115 | 71503 | UX | 132893 | 80437 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
Tiger T760 | Single-Core | 1058 | 653 | Multi-Core | 4040 | 2693 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
Tiger T760 | Frequency | 2620 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4/4x/4y | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is 4% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Mali-G57 MP5 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 705.5 | # of Cores | 4 | 5 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 27.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 87.4 | 56.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.4 | 58.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 49.9 | 42.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 75.8 | 49.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 107.5 | 75.6 | Real Racing 3 | 105.6 | 72.3 | Sniper 3D | 115.4 | 128.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 73.2 | 81.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 77.3 | 84.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.6 | 64.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 14 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Tiger T760 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|