MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T760

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Detailed comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T760, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Antutu v10, 9, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench 6, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or Tiger T760.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

47%

Tiger T760

32%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

84%

Tiger T760

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

44%

Tiger T760

31%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Tiger T760
Total score	1024044	446896
CPU	286722	125130
GPU	389132	169811
MEM	163842	71503
UX	184337	80437

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Tiger T760
Single-Core	1253	653
Multi-Core	4256	2693

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Tiger T760
Frequency	3100 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	51	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	256 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is 19% better than Tiger T760 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G57 MP5
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	912	705.5
# of Cores	6	5
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	38.4	27.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.7	56.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.2	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.7	42.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.9	49.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.1	75.6
Real Racing 3	145.2	72.3
Sniper 3D	160.3	128.4
Need for Speed No Limits	100.3	81.2
Mortal Kombat X	104.7	84.1
CSR Racing 2	87.2	64.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP	Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra specs and review.

Tiger T760 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T760 specs and review.