|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|
Comparisons 29-10-2024 Detailed comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Unisoc Tiger T760, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2 etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 or Tiger T760.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 76% |
Tiger T760 | 32% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 96% |
Tiger T760 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 74% |
Tiger T760 | 31% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
Tiger T760 | Total score | 1657314 | 446896 | CPU | 464044 | 125130 | GPU | 629787 | 169811 | MEM | 265170 | 71503 | UX | 298317 | 80437 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
Tiger T760 | Single-Core | 2035 | 653 | Multi-Core | 6017 | 2693 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
Tiger T760 | Frequency | 300 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 3 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 12000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4/4x/4y | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T760 is 88% better than Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G57 MP5 | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 2086 | 705.5 | # of Cores | | 5 | # of Shader Units | 1536 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 61.9 | 27.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 197.3 | 56.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 116.9 | 58.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 108.2 | 42.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 166.1 | 49.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 241.8 | 75.6 | Real Racing 3 | 235.8 | 72.3 | Sniper 3D | 257.2 | 128.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 164.7 | 81.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 170.2 | 84.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 140.6 | 64.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X70 Modem-RF System 5G | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 6500 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is better: 36
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T760 is better: 3 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Tiger T760 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
| |
|