|
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Intel Atom Z2520 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Intel Atom Z2520, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 MP4 and PowerVR SGX544. This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3470 or Atom Z2520 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 3 Quad 3470 | 1% |
Atom Z2520 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 3 Quad 3470 | 26% |
Atom Z2520 | 14% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 3 Quad 3470 | 1% |
Atom Z2520 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 3 Quad 3470 |
Atom Z2520 | Total score | 18109 | 11918 | CPU | 5079 | 3335 | GPU | 6889 | 4536 | MEM | 2897 | 1906 | UX | 3255 | 2154 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 3 Quad 3470 |
Atom Z2520 | Single-Core | 48 | 31 | Multi-Core | 221 | 145 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 3 Quad 3470 |
Atom Z2520 | Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 2x1.2 GHz Cloverview | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 7 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is 14% better than Atom Z2520 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 3 Quad 3470 has -2 more core than Atom Z2520. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 MP4 | PowerVR SGX544 | GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 533 MHz | GFloPS | 16.2 | 17.06 | # of Cores | 4 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 5.1 | 3.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.6 | 9.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 9.7 | 5.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 8.9 | 5.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.1 | 7.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 18.6 | 11.5 | Real Racing 3 | 14.6 | 9.3 | Sniper 3D | 15.5 | 10.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 13.6 | 9.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 11.2 | 6.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 12.6 | 6.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.4 | Intel XMM 7160 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 72 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 6 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Exynos 3 Quad 3470 and Atom Z2520, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Atom Z2520 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|