|
Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Spreadtrum SC9830A |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Spreadtrum SC9830A, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP4 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and SC9830A is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, Octane V2, Neocore, and how good the chipsets are in games Real Racing 3, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3470 or SC9830A and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 3 Quad 3470 | 1% |
SC9830A | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 3 Quad 3470 | 26% |
SC9830A | 27% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 3 Quad 3470 | 1% |
SC9830A | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 3 Quad 3470 |
SC9830A | Total score | 18109 | 11503 | CPU | 5079 | 3228 | GPU | 6889 | 4371 | MEM | 2897 | 1846 | UX | 3255 | 2060 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 3 Quad 3470 |
SC9830A | Single-Core | 48 | 30 | Multi-Core | 221 | 140 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 3 Quad 3470 |
SC9830A | Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 7 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here SC9830A is 6% better than Exynos 3 Quad 3470 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 MP4 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 16.2 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 4 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 5.1 | 2.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.6 | 8.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 9.7 | 4.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 8.9 | 4.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.1 | 6.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 18.6 | 10.2 | Real Racing 3 | 14.6 | 9 | Sniper 3D | 15.5 | 8.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 13.6 | 5.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 11.2 | 6.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 12.6 | 6.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.4 | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9830A is better: 4 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
SC9830A SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|