Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP4 and Mali-450 MP4.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Atom x3-C3200RK is quad-core () and Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Geekbench, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Atom x3-C3200RK or Exynos 3 Quad 3470 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Atom x3-C3200RK

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Atom x3-C3200RK

26%

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Atom x3-C3200RK

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Atom x3-C3200RK	Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Total score	19384	18109
CPU	5426	5079
GPU	7356	6889
MEM	3101	2897
UX	3489	3255

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Atom x3-C3200RK	Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Single-Core	51	48
Multi-Core	236	221

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Atom x3-C3200RK	Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Frequency	1100 MHz	1400 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.1 GHz	4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR2/3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	1333	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is 21% better than Atom x3-C3200RK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-450 MP4	Mali-400 MP4
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	35.77	16.2
# of Cores	4	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	5.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	16.4	14.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.5	9.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.1	8.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.6	12.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.5	18.6
Real Racing 3	15.8	14.6
Sniper 3D	16.8	15.5
Need for Speed No Limits	14.7	13.6
Mortal Kombat X	13.7	11.2
CSR Racing 2	14.7	12.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.4
Download speed	21 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	6 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3200RK is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is better: 9
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Atom x3-C3200RK and Exynos 3 Quad 3470, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Atom x3-C3200RK SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3200RK specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3470 specs and review.