MediaTek MT6575 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 MP4 and PowerVR SGX531.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like Geekbench, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Octane V2, GFXBench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D etc.

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT6575 or Exynos 3 Quad 3470 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Total score	10235	18109
CPU	2875	5079
GPU	3891	6889
MEM	1627	2897
UX	1834	3255

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Single-Core	27	48
Multi-Core	125	221

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	Exynos 3 Quad 3470
Frequency	1000 MHz	1400 MHz
Cores	1	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	800
Memory bandwidth	4	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is 28% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 3 more core than Exynos 3 Quad 3470. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400 MP4
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	16.2
# of Cores	1	4
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	5.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	14.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	9.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	8.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	12.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	18.6
Real Racing 3	7.2	14.6
Sniper 3D	5.8	15.5
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	13.6
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	11.2
CSR Racing 2	4.7	12.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.4
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is better: 37
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6575 and Exynos 3 Quad 3470, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3470 specs and review.