Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Intel Atom x3-C3130

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 vs Intel Atom x3-C3130, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Atom x3-C3130 is dual-core (SoFIA). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Exynos 3 Quad 3470 or Atom x3-C3130 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Atom x3-C3130

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

26%

Atom x3-C3130

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 3 Quad 3470

Atom x3-C3130

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 3 Quad 3470	Atom x3-C3130
Total score	18109	15909
CPU	5079	4444
GPU	6889	6045
MEM	2897	2544
UX	3255	2873

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 3 Quad 3470	Atom x3-C3130
Single-Core	48	42
Multi-Core	221	194

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 3 Quad 3470	Atom x3-C3130
Frequency	1400 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	4	2
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	2x1.0 GHz SoFIA
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	3 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	800
Memory bandwidth	7	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is 28% better than Atom x3-C3130 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 3 Quad 3470 has -2 more core than Atom x3-C3130. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP4	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	450 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	16.2	10.8
# of Cores	4	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.1	5.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	14.6	13.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.7	8.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.9	7.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.1	10.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	18.6	16.3
Real Racing 3	14.6	12.2
Sniper 3D	15.5	17.8
Need for Speed No Limits	13.6	13
Mortal Kombat X	11.2	9.3
CSR Racing 2	12.6	8.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE Cat.4	A-GOLD 620
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	21 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3130 is better: 6
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 3 Quad 3470 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 3 Quad 3470 specs and review.

Atom x3-C3130 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3130 specs and review.