Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 610 and Adreno 506.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Snapdragon 665 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Octane V2, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 632 or Snapdragon 665 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 632

Snapdragon 665

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 632

59%

Snapdragon 665

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 632

Snapdragon 665

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 632	Snapdragon 665
Total score	93355	153366
CPU	26145	42942
GPU	35471	58273
MEM	14927	24532
UX	16804	27605

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 632	Snapdragon 665
Single-Core	241	314
Multi-Core	1087	1320

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 632	Snapdragon 665
Frequency	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	11 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth	7.46	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 665 is 9% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 506	Adreno 610
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	130	312
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	96	192
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		29.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.6	28.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.2	55.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.7	30.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.8	23.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.2	39.6
Real Racing 3	41.5	83.3
Sniper 3D	43.2	122.1
Need for Speed No Limits	39.8	99.9
Mortal Kombat X	43.2	88.8
CSR Racing 2	39.8	66.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 165
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS	GLONASS, GPS, Galileo, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.

Snapdragon 665 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 665 specs and review.