Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Unisoc Tiger T310

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Unisoc Tiger T310, comparison of GPUs Mali-G71 MP2 and Adreno 506.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, Neocore, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 632 or Tiger T310 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 632

Tiger T310

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 632

59%

Tiger T310

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 632

Tiger T310

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 632	Tiger T310
Total score	93355	102948
CPU	26145	28818
GPU	35471	39119
MEM	14927	16471
UX	16804	18534

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 632	Tiger T310
Single-Core	241	210
Multi-Core	1087	926

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 632	Tiger T310
Frequency	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260	1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1066
Memory bandwidth	7.46	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	384 KB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T310 is 9% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 632 has -4 more core than Tiger T310. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 506	Mali-G71 MP2
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	770 MHz
GFloPS	130	52.3
# of Cores		2
# of Shader Units	96
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.6	23.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.2	38.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.7	25.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.8	19.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.2	24.1
Real Racing 3	41.5	67.4
Sniper 3D	43.2	61.6
Need for Speed No Limits	39.8	61.6
Mortal Kombat X	43.2	61.6
CSR Racing 2	39.8	42.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem	LTE-7
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 28
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon 632 and Tiger T310, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.

Tiger T310 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Tiger T310 specs and review.