Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 510 and Adreno 506.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, Octane V2, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the chipsets are in games PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 or Snapdragon 632 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 650 MSM8956

Snapdragon 632

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 650 MSM8956

25%

Snapdragon 632

59%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 650 MSM8956

Snapdragon 632

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 650 MSM8956	Snapdragon 632
Total score	86746	93355
CPU	24279	26145
GPU	32957	35471
MEM	13874	14927
UX	15623	16804

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 650 MSM8956	Snapdragon 632
Single-Core	224	241
Multi-Core	1010	1087

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 650 MSM8956	Snapdragon 632
Frequency	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	8 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth	14	7.46
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 has 2 more core than Snapdragon 632. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 510	Adreno 506
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	176	130
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	128	96
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	18.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	31.1	33.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	19.9	20.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.4	15.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	18.2	19.2
Real Racing 3	54.4	41.5
Sniper 3D	59.1	43.2
Need for Speed No Limits	56	39.8
Mortal Kombat X	45.1	43.2
CSR Racing 2	43.5	39.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution		13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X8 LTE modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 19
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 specs and review.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.