|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884, compare of GPUs Adreno 506 and Mali-G71 MP18. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, and how good the chipsets are in games Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 632 or Exynos 7 Octa 7884 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 632 | 6% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 632 | 59% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 57% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 632 | 3% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 632 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Total score | 93355 | 116251 | CPU | 26145 | 32549 | GPU | 35471 | 44170 | MEM | 14927 | 18591 | UX | 16804 | 20926 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 632 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Single-Core | 241 | 337 | Multi-Core | 1087 | 1046 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 632 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | 2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 7.46 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | | 512 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 632 is 11% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 130 | 334 | # of Cores | | 18 | # of Shader Units | 96 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 23.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.6 | 44.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 33.2 | 47.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.7 | 25.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.8 | 40.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 19.2 | 58.9 | Real Racing 3 | 41.5 | 82.8 | Sniper 3D | 43.2 | 61.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 39.8 | 66.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 43.2 | 75.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 39.8 | 66.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 600 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 28 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Snapdragon 632 and Exynos 7 Octa 7884, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 632 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|