MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 506 and Mali-T880 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X23 (MT6797D) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Helio X23 (MT6797D) or Snapdragon 632 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X23 (MT6797D)

Snapdragon 632

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X23 (MT6797D)

42%

Snapdragon 632

59%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X23 (MT6797D)

Snapdragon 632

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X23 (MT6797D)	Snapdragon 632
Total score	92331	93355
CPU	25856	26145
GPU	35085	35471
MEM	14776	14927
UX	16609	16804

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X23 (MT6797D)	Snapdragon 632
Single-Core	238	241
Multi-Core	1075	1087

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X23 (MT6797D)	Snapdragon 632
Frequency	2300 MHz	1800 MHz
Cores	10	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1866
Memory bandwidth	14	7.46
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X23 (MT6797D) is 21% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X23 (MT6797D) has -2 more core than Snapdragon 632. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Adreno 506
GPU Frequency	780 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	106	130
# of Cores	4
# of Shader Units		96
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	19.4	18.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.3	33.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	21.6	20.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	16.8	15.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.9	19.2
Real Racing 3	41.6	41.5
Sniper 3D	63.3	43.2
Need for Speed No Limits	53.3	39.8
Mortal Kombat X	53.3	43.2
CSR Racing 2	46.6	39.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution		13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 16
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio X23 (MT6797D) and Snapdragon 632, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio X23 (MT6797D) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X23 (MT6797D) specs and review.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.