Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, comparison of GPUs Adreno 506 and Adreno 506.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon SiP1 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Snapdragon SiP1 or Snapdragon 632 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon SiP1

Snapdragon 632

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon SiP1

61%

Snapdragon 632

59%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon SiP1

Snapdragon 632

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon SiP1	Snapdragon 632
Total score	66906	93355
CPU	18732	26145
GPU	25415	35471
MEM	10704	14927
UX	12038	16804

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon SiP1	Snapdragon 632
Single-Core	173	241
Multi-Core	779	1087

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon SiP1	Snapdragon 632
Frequency	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.48GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1866
Memory bandwidth	10	7.46
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 506	Adreno 506
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	130	130
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	96	96
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	13.4	18.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.3	33.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	20.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	10.1	15.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	14.2	19.2
Real Racing 3	46.6	41.5
Sniper 3D	30.3	43.2
Need for Speed No Limits	32.6	39.8
Mortal Kombat X	33.8	43.2
CSR Racing 2	28	39.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X9 LTE modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon SiP1 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon SiP1 specs and review.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.