Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T), compare of GPUs Adreno 506 and Mali-T880 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Helio P25 (MT6757T) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 632 or Helio P25 (MT6757T) and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 632

Helio P25 (MT6757T)

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 632

59%

Helio P25 (MT6757T)

49%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 632

Helio P25 (MT6757T)

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 632	Helio P25 (MT6757T)
Total score	93355	63651
CPU	26145	17812
GPU	35471	24191
MEM	14927	10184
UX	16804	11466

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 632	Helio P25 (MT6757T)
Single-Core	241	164
Multi-Core	1087	741

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 632	Helio P25 (MT6757T)
Frequency	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	6 Gb	LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB
Memory Frequency	1866	2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz
Memory bandwidth	7.46	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 (MT6757T) is 30% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 506	Mali-T880 MP2
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	1000 MHz
GFloPS	130	68
# of Cores		2
# of Shader Units	96
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.6	12.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.2	22.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.7	14.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.8	10.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.2	13.5
Real Racing 3	41.5	27.6
Sniper 3D	43.2	48.6
Need for Speed No Limits	39.8	30.9
Mortal Kombat X	43.2	25.4
CSR Racing 2	39.8	24.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) is better: 11
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.

Helio P25 (MT6757T) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Helio P25 (MT6757T) specs and review.