Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, comparison of GPUs Adreno 615 and Adreno 506.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Vellamo, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 632 or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 632

Snapdragon 670

10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 632

59%

Snapdragon 670

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 632

Snapdragon 670

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 632	Snapdragon 670
Total score	93355	151765
CPU	26145	42500
GPU	35471	57660
MEM	14927	24290
UX	16804	27322

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 632	Snapdragon 670
Single-Core	241	311
Multi-Core	1087	1306

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 632	Snapdragon 670
Frequency	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth	7.46	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	256 KB
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 670 is 9% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 506	Adreno 615
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	130	448
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	96	256
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.6	27.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.2	54.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.7	29.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.8	22.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.2	38.7
Real Racing 3	41.5	95.7
Sniper 3D	43.2	103.9
Need for Speed No Limits	39.8	65.6
Mortal Kombat X	43.2	71.1
CSR Racing 2	39.8	60.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS	Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 29
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Snapdragon 632 and Snapdragon 670, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.

Snapdragon 670 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 670 specs and review.