Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880, comparison of GPUs Adreno 506 and Mali-T830 MP3.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260) and Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Vellamo, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Octane V2, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 632 or Exynos 7 Octa 7880 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 632

Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 632

59%

Exynos 7 Octa 7880

57%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 632

Exynos 7 Octa 7880

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 632	Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Total score	93355	60634
CPU	26145	16971
GPU	35471	23044
MEM	14927	9701
UX	16804	10913

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 632	Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Single-Core	241	156
Multi-Core	1087	706

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 632	Exynos 7 Octa 7880
Frequency	1800 MHz	1900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260	8x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	4 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth	7.46	16.5
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is 5% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 506	Mali-T830 MP3
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	130	71.4
# of Cores		3
# of Shader Units	96
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.6	10.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	33.2	19.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.7	11.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.8	7.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	19.2	11.3
Real Racing 3	41.5	29.3
Sniper 3D	43.2	42.9
Need for Speed No Limits	39.8	31.2
Mortal Kombat X	43.2	28.3
CSR Racing 2	39.8	25.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	24 MP	21.7 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem	LTE Cat.7 3CA
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	100 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 7880 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 7 Octa 7880 specs and review.