MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Adreno 506.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio X20 (MT6797) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Snapdragon 632 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chipsets in PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Helio X20 (MT6797) or Snapdragon 632 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X20 (MT6797)

Snapdragon 632

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X20 (MT6797)

42%

Snapdragon 632

59%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X20 (MT6797)

Snapdragon 632

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X20 (MT6797)	Snapdragon 632
Total score	83288	93355
CPU	23311	26145
GPU	31649	35471
MEM	13320	14927
UX	14981	16804

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X20 (MT6797)	Snapdragon 632
Single-Core	215	241
Multi-Core	970	1087

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X20 (MT6797)	Snapdragon 632
Frequency	2100 MHz	1800 MHz
Cores	10	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1866
Memory bandwidth	12.8	7.46
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache		128 KB
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X20 (MT6797) is 14% better than Snapdragon 632 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X20 (MT6797) has -2 more core than Snapdragon 632. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Adreno 506
GPU Frequency	780 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	106	130
# of Cores	4
# of Shader Units		96
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	16.4	18.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	29.1	33.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	17.7	20.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.1	15.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	16.7	19.2
Real Racing 3	36.4	41.5
Sniper 3D	46.6	43.2
Need for Speed No Limits	52.4	39.8
Mortal Kombat X	37.8	43.2
CSR Racing 2	40.7	39.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution		13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better: 24
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Helio X20 (MT6797) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X20 (MT6797) specs and review.

Snapdragon 632 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 632 specs and review.