 |
Intel Core i7-13800H vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i7-13800H vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like WPrime, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, RealBench, 3DMark, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS or Intel Core i7-13800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13800H | 59% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | 58% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13800H is 1% better than Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13800H | 58% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 102.2 | 96.7 | | Valorant | 116.2 | 109.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 61.5 | | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 103.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 82.4 | | Overwatch | 94.1 | 89.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 75.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 54.9 | | Warzone | 90.6 | 85.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 92.3 | | Valheim | 96.4 | 91.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13800H | 140% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | 121% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13800H is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 295 | 265 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2867 | 2557 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 615 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6345 | 5607 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1623 | 1527 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18210 | 15603 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | | Single-Core | 1486 | 3409 | | Multi-Core | 31020 | 28207 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | | Single-Core | 1903 | 1279 | | Multi-Core | 13966 | 8537 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13800H |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | | Announcement date | January 28, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rembrandt | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 13 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 6 | | Threads | 20 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 7200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 384KB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 3MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| FP7: 100-000000543 FP7r2:100-000000565
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13800H is 17% better than Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13800H has 8 more core than Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13800H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS is better: 5
Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13800H and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13800H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
