 |
Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i9-9980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i9-9980HK tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as WPrime, AIDA64, Furmark, 7zip, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, PassMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9980HK or Intel Core i7-13800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13800H | 59% |
Core i9-9980HK | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13800H is 8% better than Core i9-9980HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13800H | 58% |
Core i9-9980HK | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 102.2 | 95.7 | | Valorant | 116.2 | 108.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 60.9 | | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 102.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 94.1 | 88.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 75.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 90.6 | 84.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 91.4 | | Valheim | 96.4 | 90.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13800H | 140% |
Core i9-9980HK | 86% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13800H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9980HK since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 295 | 196 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2867 | 1607 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 485 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6345 | 3503 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1623 | 1186 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18210 | 8370 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Single-Core | 1486 | 2657 | | Multi-Core | 31020 | 15065 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Single-Core | 1903 | 1165 | | Multi-Core | 13966 | 7554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-9980HK | | Announcement date | January 28, 2023 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13800H is 40% better than Core i9-9980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13800H has 6 more core than Core i9-9980HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13800H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9980HK is better: 4
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i9-9980HK before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13800H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-9980HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
